Цитирай Първоначално написано от dreamwalker Виж мнението
We have three different accounts of Paul’s unsupported claim of conversion. Two of them are similar, Acts 9:1-18, 22:1-15 (except the part about him being sent to the Gentiles, 22:21), but not the third account, Acts 26:10-19. In the first two stories, Paul specifically asked the Lord what he should do and the Lord told him to go to Damascus where he would be told all things. In the third story, however, Paul received full revelation on the spot. Which one is it Paul? Paul is caught in a lie (there will be more).

There exists a three-year discrepancy between Paul’s conversion and his trip to Jerusalem, and he admits to having little or no tutoring by the apostles (Galatians is the earlier of the two accounts). Interestingly enough, there’s a document in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Q40266, called ‘The Damascus Document’, written around the time of Saul/Paul’s trip to Arabia (wherein existed the Essene site of Qumran). It’s an excommunication document condemning an unidentified man; referred to as the ‘Lying Adversary, the Lying Spouter, the Tongue, the Scoffer’ who rejected the law in the midst of the whole congregation.

П.П. Пращам линкове, защото книгите не са ми под ръка в момента, когато ги получа, ще пиша повече.

Аха някакъв си документ от свитъците в Мъртво море, написано около времето на Павел.

Ми добре вярвай на свитъците от Мъртво море, а не на свитъците на Библията, ся тва как да ти го доказвам, кауза пердута. Както си решиш. Нали за това имаш сводна воля. Няма да те убивам за обида на Павел споко. Щом не ти се иска да вярваш на Павел, по-добре недей.